FUT vs FUE

Advantages of FUE (vs. FUT) Disadvantages of FUE (vs. FUT)
No linear scar in donor area.

  • Decreased healing time in the donor area. Important for those who wear their hair very short where the scar may become visible.
  • Important for those who have a history of keloids, thickened or stretched scars.
Follicular units in FUE are harvested from a much greater area of the donor zone compared to FUT.

  • In FUT, all the hair is harvested from the mid-portion of the donor area where the hair is most permanent. This is done to maximize the yield of high quality grafts from the permanent zone. In FUE, to obtain a sufficient number of grafts, follicular units must also be extracted from the upper and lower portions of the donor region and these may not be as permanent. Therefore, over time, the hair transplanted from these areas to other parts of the scalp may be lost.
    Over time, continued thinning in the upper and lower parts of the donor zone may cause the FUE scars to become visible.
Decreased healing time in the donor area.

  • The small holes that are created with FUE will heal in a shorter period of time than the linear FUT-strip scar.
Graft quality is not as good compared to FUT.

  • Greater rate of follicular transection (damage to grafts) compared to FUT.
  • Grafts more fragile and subject to trauma during placement, because extracted grafts often lack the protective dermis and fat of microscopically dissected grafts.
  • More difficult to capture the entire follicular unit – resulting in lower density.
No limitations on strenuous exercise after the procedure.

  • The concern with a FUT-strip scar is that strenuous exercise soon after the procedure can lead to scar widening. The small surgical holes created from the FUE procedure do not widen and are not affected by exercise after the procedure.
The maximum follicular unit graft yield is lower than with FUT.

  • Lower quality grafts may not grow as well.
  • Inability to harvest all the hair from the mid-permanent zone results in decreased numbers of grafts.
  • The scarring and distortion of the donor scalp from FUE makes subsequent FUE sessions more difficult.
Less post-op discomfort in the donor area.

  • With FUE there is essentially no discomfort after the procedure.
With each subsequent surgical session, the scarring in FUE is additive.

  • For example, if the first FUE session is 2,000 grafts, there will be 2,000 tiny round scars. With a second session of 2,000 grafts, there will be a total of 4,000 scars.
  • In contrast, with FUT, the first scar is completely removed in the next procedure. Even though the scar may be longer in the next session, with FUT, regardless of the number of procedures, the patient is left with only one scar.
Useful for those with a greater risk of donor scarring.

  • Younger patients.
  • Very muscular, athletic patients.
  • Those with very tight or very loose scalps.
  • Those with a history of keloid scarring or poor healing.
In large FUE hair transplant sessions, the entire donor area must be shaved

  • This may present a significant temporary cosmetic problem for working patients or those in the public eye.
  • It can take 10 days to two weeks for your donor hair to grow to camouflage the small holes created from the procedure.
  • Exception: For small and intermediate size FUE cases (up to 1200 grafts), Long-Hair FUE may be an option. With this technique, the entire donor area of the back and sides of the scalp does not need to be shaved. On the day of the procedure, the surgeon lifts up the hair, clips a long thin band of donor hair, then extracts follicular units from this limited region of the scalp. After the procedure, the patient simply combs down their hair to cover the donor zone. With Long-hair FUE, patients can resume their work, or daily routine, soon after their hair restoration procedure.
Useful for repairing donor scars that cannot be excised.

  • If a patient has previously undergone a FUT procedure and has a widened donor scar, an FUE procedure can be performed to transplant hair into the scar to help camouflage it.
Microscopic dissection may be needed in addition to the extraction.

  • If the number of single-hair grafts is inadequate. In an FUE procedure, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-hair grafts are harvested; however, only 1-hair grafts can be used at the hairline. If there are not enough 1-hair grafts harvested, then the available grafts are dissected to create them.
  • To remove hair fragments.
Provides an alternative when the scalp is too tight for a strip excision.

  • If a patient has previously undergone one or more FUT procedures, there may not be enough scalp laxity for another FUT strip to be harvested. In this case, an FUE procedure can be useful.
After large numbers of grafts are harvested, fine stippled scars may become visible due to thinning of donor area.
Enables one to harvest finer hair from the nape of the neck.

  • For use at the hairline or the eyebrows.
Long-term, if the donor area narrows, the scarring may become visible.

  • Both FUT and FUE produce donor scarring; FUT, in the form of a line and FUE in the shape of small, round dots. With FUT, the line is placed in the mid-portion of the permanent zone and in FUE the dots are scattered all over the donor area. If a patient becomes extensively bald (i.e. the donor fringe becomes very narrow), the line of FUT will generally still remain hidden, whereas the dots of FUE will be seen above the fringe of hair. In the less likely scenario of the donor hair actually thinning significantly, both the line (of FUT) and the dots (of FUE) may become visible.
  The size of a single session is limited

  • Since the extraction process is slower than strip harvesting, large procedures may need to be performed over two days. The FUT procedure is “performed in parallel” means that after the strip of scalp is harvested, the grafts are dissected by a number of dissectors working simultaneously. At the same time, the doctor is creating the recipient sites. In contrast, during an FUE procedure, the grafts are harvested one-by-one and site creation cannot be done while the grafts are being harvested. As a consequence, FUE is a significantly longer procedure than FUT for an equivalent number of grafts.
  With FUE, grafts are usually out of the body for a longer period of time compared to FUT.

  • This runs the risk of sub-optimal growth.
  • This problem can be mitigated by performing large sessions of FUE over two consecutive days. Pre-making recipient sites mitigates this issue to some degree, since once the surgical graft harvesting is completed, the grafts can be immediately placed in the pre-made recipient sites.
  FUE is usually more expensive than FUT.

  • This is mainly because FUE is a more time consuming procedure.